OPINION – Carol Altmann
[dropcap style=”color: #a02f2f;”] T [/dropcap]here is a ticking bomb under south-west Victoria called a lack of education and it is set to blow up in our faces unless we start to do something about it.
For a variety of reasons that are still being nailed down, hundreds of teenagers in the south-west are dropping out of school and either doing nothing, having babies, drifting, or falling into a nasty, destructive spiral that – once they have tumbled in – is extremely hard to climb out of.
The numbers are chilling.
The six councils that make up the Great South Coast Group (stretching from Corangamite to the South Australian border and up to Hamilton) have reported that only 57 per cent of all school kids in our area are finishing Year 12 or its equivalent.
In some areas, such as in and around Portland and Heywood, is it a lowly 51 per cent.
For boys, the figures are like those from a bygone era: 44 per cent in Glenelg, 46 per cent in Corangamite and 48 per cent in Moyne.
As one member of the Great South Coast Group put it, we are teetering “on third world standards”.
[dropcap style=”color: #a02f2f;”] T [/dropcap]hese dreadful figures come amid news that youth unemployment among 15-19 years olds is at its highest level in Victoria since 1997, with 20 per cent of kids in this age bracket having absolutely nothing to do when they get up every day.
In short, we are failing the next generation by selling them the great lie that if they don’t finish secondary school, they can still have a good future.
They won’t, because the sort of jobs that we might have picked up with a Year 9 or Year 10 education are going or gone.
Thousands will be left out and condemned to an under-class that struggles financially, emotionally and socially for their entire lives.
And if they fall behind, south-west Victoria will fall behind and become a welfare-basket backwater that can no longer cut it on a national, let alone international scale.
If this all sounds grim, it is because it is and it is happening right before our eyes and we, as a community, are contributing to the problem unless we help to fix it.
[dropcap style=”color: #a02f2f;”] T [/dropcap]he Great South Coast Group set up a working party which has spent almost three years trying to get their heads around the enormity of the problem and what to do about it.
At times, one member said, it felt like an almost overwhelming task and no wonder, because in order to really make a change, everything has to change.
After months of research, thinking and talking, the working group has come up with a broad-scale plan that challenges us to do things differently and to step away from our old ways of thinking.
Take, for example, the thinking that “the government” will step in and fix it. We have tried that, and it is not working.
What has happened, instead, is that multiple government departments are all tackling the same problem, in their own ways, without talking to each other, without being allowed to talk to each other and some kids end up with 12 separate case workers and no long-term solution.
(There is a great anecdote from a homelessness program in Woollomooloo, Sydney, where 52 “service providers” were all helping the homeless without knowing how many homeless they were helping. It turns out there were 90 people sleeping rough and this turned the issue on its head to become the “90 homes for 90 lives” project.)
[dropcap style=”color: #a02f2f;”] T [/dropcap]ake, as another example, our thinking that the problem starts in early primary school, when kids learn to read and write and do sums.
Wrong. The working party argues that it begins at conception.
The minute that little sperm penetrates that egg, a whole suitcase of potential – or lack of – flips open for that child: is the mother an addict? Is the father? Are they comfortably well-off or poor? Literate or illiterate? Supported or isolated?
And what about the community mindset that worships all forms of sporting prowess, especially football, above academic ability?
This needs to change too.
The working party has based its approach on what is called a Collective Impact model – snappy title, right? – but it is exciting and has worked very successfully in places like Sweden, Canada and the US, but is only now catching on in Australia.
In a nutshell, it involves motivating the community as a whole – politicians, parents, teachers, employers, philanthropists, business owners, the elderly, service clubs, sporting clubs, you and me – to work for real change.
Instead of operating in our own little corners, or doing nothing at all, we are urged to work collaboratively and collectively. “That is not my area,” or “that is not my problem,” won’t be part of the language.
[dropcap style=”color: #a02f2f;”] T [/dropcap]he first step, and it is happening as we speak, is the Great South Coast Group setting out a community action plan for each council area, because each has its own challenges.
Beautiful little Mortlake, for example, is doing its best not to become a welfare ghetto in the face of low-cost housing, poor services, poor public transport and the sheer boredom of those who have been located there by “the system”.
The action groups aim to get people talking about the problem – like we are now – and set down steps for change that we can all be involved in, even if it is something as simple as listening to a child read.
It will take years to turn around a mind-set that has been years in the making, but I think this is the best approach I have seen in a long time and I can’t wait to see it unfold.
Are we all prepared to help?
[box] The Great South Coast working party members include: Helen Bayne (South West PCP), Helen Durant (Great South Coast Early Years Network), Karen Foster (Great South Coast), Toni Jenkins (South-West LLEN), Marcus McCormick (South-West LLEN), Vicky Mason (W’bool City Council), Anne Murphy (Glenelg & Southern Grampians LLEN), Mary Pendergast (Dept of Education and Early Childhood Development) and Kaye Schofield (RMIT Hamilton). You can read more about the project here.[/box]
[button link=”http://the-terrier.com.au/subscribe-2/” type=”icon” icon=”heart” newwindow=”yes”] Would you like to have early access to our Opinion pieces? Please subscribe here.[/button]
Read more Opinion pieces here…
Trader levy deal…and the Jennifer Lowe factor
Council’s racing hospitality bill hard to swallow
Reekie to challenge Napthine at state election
Forget cover ups, roll right over Rolf
Community vision should extend city wide: Julie Eagles
Flagstaff Hill at $15 million crossroad
Scrap trader levy and start over
What is holding Portland back?
great article Carol – and as always you are spot on. The kids that get an education leave (and very often never return) and the ones that don’t stay and perpetuate the lack of education cycle – an education is so often seen as unimportant – but the current political environment will make it doubly hard for the less well off to be able to afford an education as will the dreadful cuts to TAFE.
Oh where to start on this critical issue Carol? If I can offer some small suggestions. I think you’re right to identify ‘mindset’ as an important factor in this situation. As they say “perspective is everything”. Lets start by changing the way we talk about supplying resources to education. Education is not a “cost” to the community, it’s an “investment” in our community. And it’s a long-term investment. The “return on investment” is the creation of a community where we can all flourish in one form or another. Perhaps flourishing is not the form of “return” we can measure in a dollars and cents way. But that doesn’t make it any less valuable. Seems to me we have a very human trait of seeing issues in terms of deficits or deficiencies i.e problems. Maybe we do this this to create the urgency or impetus to tackle an issue. The trap being we project the problem onto people, then people become the problem. Be they the unemployed, the homeless, welfare recipients or any disenfranchised group in our community you could care to mention. When you see people as having potential as opposed to being problems it creates the mindset where as a community we want to make the “investment” and where, as a community we reap the “return”.